docs-style-tone — Style and Tone Analysis
Before Starting#
- Get the repository. Ask for the GitHub repo URL or
{user}/{repo}. - Check Docsbook. Run
mcp__docsbook__list_workspacesto find the workspace.- If found → use
mcp__docsbook__get_doc_graphto get all pages. - If not found → offer to add it first.
- If found → use
- Check the graph. If
get_doc_graphreturns an empty graph or no data → runmcp__docsbook__reindex_doc_graphto generate it, then retry. If it returns a stale warning, offer to reindex before proceeding. - Read page content. Use
mcp__docsbook__read_doc_sectionsto access the text of each page. - Sample first, then deep-dive. Read a few pages across different types (tutorial, reference, how-to) to calibrate the general style before flagging specifics.
Core Principles#
1. Clarity over cleverness#
Technical documentation exists to transfer knowledge efficiently. Every unnecessary word, passive construction, or vague adjective adds friction.
2. Voice consistency across pages#
A user reading multiple pages should feel they're in the same product. Inconsistent terminology ("workspace" vs. "project" vs. "repo") creates confusion and support tickets.
3. Second person, present tense#
Address the reader as "you". Use present tense. "Click Save" not "You will need to click Save" or "The Save button should be clicked."
4. Marketing language belongs in marketing copy#
"Powerful", "robust", "seamless", "easy", "simply", "just" — these words are empty in documentation and can feel condescending when a reader is stuck.
Checklist#
Voice and Person#
- Active voice is the default — "The system returns an error" → "Docsbook returns an error"
- Second person ("you") — not third person ("the user") or first person plural ("we recommend")
- Imperative for instructions — "Click Save" not "You should click Save"
- Present tense — "This returns a JSON object" not "This will return a JSON object"
- First person plural is acceptable for opinions only — "We recommend using X" in explanation pages
Filler and Marketing Words#
Words to flag (not ban — context matters, but flag for review):
| Word/Pattern | Why It's a Problem |
|---|---|
| "simply", "just", "easily" | Condescending when reader is stuck |
| "powerful", "robust", "flexible" | Empty marketing words with no specifics |
| "seamlessly", "effortlessly" | Promises that may not match user experience |
| "of course", "obviously", "naturally" | Excludes readers who don't find it obvious |
| "please note that" | Filler before a note — use a callout instead |
| "in order to" | Replace with "to" |
| "utilize" | Replace with "use" |
| "leverage" | Replace with "use" |
| "make sure to" | Replace with "ensure" or remove |
Sentence Length and Structure#
- Sentences under 25 words on average
- Paragraphs 2-4 sentences — no wall-of-text paragraphs
- One idea per sentence — split compound sentences when they contain two distinct ideas
- Lists for 3+ parallel items — not a run-on sentence with "and" connectors
- Lead with the main clause — avoid burying the key information at the end
Headings#
- Sentence case — "Set up a custom domain" not "Set Up A Custom Domain"
- No click-bait headings — "You won't believe how easy this is" has no place in docs
- Descriptive, not clever — "Configuration options" not "Getting fancy"
- Parallel structure in sibling headings — all nouns, or all verb phrases, not mixed
Terminology Consistency#
- Single term for each concept — pick one and stick to it
- Define terms at first use — especially abbreviations and jargon
- Product names are exact — "Docsbook" not "docsbook", "DocBook", or "docs book"
- No synonyms for the same UI element — if it's called "workspace" in the UI, call it "workspace" everywhere
Tone by Page Type#
| Type | Expected Tone |
|---|---|
| Tutorial | Encouraging, supportive — "You've just created your first workspace!" |
| How-to guide | Efficient, task-focused — no preamble, get to the steps |
| Reference | Neutral, precise — no personality, just facts |
| Explanation | Conversational but authoritative — "Here's why this matters..." |
What to Look For#
| Severity | Problem | Detection |
|---|---|---|
high |
Terminology inconsistency — same concept, different words | grep for "workspace|project|repo" in same context |
high |
Passive voice in instructions | "is clicked", "should be set", "will be returned" |
high |
"simply" / "just" / "easily" in a how-to or tutorial | grep pattern |
medium |
Sentence over 40 words | Word count per sentence |
medium |
Marketing adjectives without specifics | "powerful", "robust", "seamless" |
medium |
Second-person inconsistency — mixed "you" and "the user" | grep pattern |
medium |
"In order to" (verbose) | Replace with "to" |
medium |
Heading not in sentence case | Capital letters in non-proper nouns |
low |
"Please note that" filler | Replace with a callout |
low |
"Utilize" instead of "use" | Direct replacement |
low |
Undefined abbreviation at first use | Scan for abbreviation patterns |
Output Format#
{
"type": "condescending_filler",
"severity": "high",
"skill": "docs-style-tone",
"location": "docs/quick-start.md#line-23",
"found": "'Simply click the Connect button and you're done.' — 'simply' implies the task is trivial, which feels dismissive when a user is stuck.",
"suggestion": "Remove 'Simply': 'Click the Connect button to finish setup.'",
"action": "remove_filler_word",
"constraints": {
"word": "simply"
}
}{
"type": "passive_voice_in_instruction",
"severity": "high",
"skill": "docs-style-tone",
"location": "docs/guides/authentication.md#line-45",
"found": "'The API key should be added to the .env file' — passive voice buries who does the action.",
"suggestion": "Use active imperative: 'Add the API key to your .env file:'",
"action": "rewrite_to_active_voice",
"constraints": {}
}{
"type": "terminology_inconsistency",
"severity": "high",
"skill": "docs-style-tone",
"location": "docs/api/workspaces.md",
"found": "Page uses 'workspace' (lines 1-30) and 'project' (lines 31-60) to refer to the same concept.",
"suggestion": "Use 'workspace' consistently throughout, matching the UI label.",
"action": "normalize_terminology",
"constraints": {
"canonical_term": "workspace",
"replace": ["project"]
}
}{
"type": "marketing_adjective",
"severity": "medium",
"skill": "docs-style-tone",
"location": "docs/concepts/architecture.md#line-8",
"found": "'Docsbook's powerful indexing engine...' — 'powerful' adds no information.",
"suggestion": "Replace with a specific claim: 'Docsbook's indexing engine processes a 500-page repo in under 30 seconds', or remove the adjective entirely.",
"action": "replace_with_specific_claim",
"constraints": {}
}Task-Specific Questions#
When invoked directly, ask:
- Does this project have a style guide? If yes, analyze against that. If no, use these defaults.
- Language? Style rules differ for English vs. localized documentation.
- Which pages are highest priority? Tier 1 pages (quick-start, pricing) first.
- How strict on passive voice? Some technical writing intentionally uses passive for reference pages.
Tool Integrations#
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
mcp__docsbook__list_workspaces |
Find workspace |
mcp__docsbook__get_doc_graph |
Page list |
mcp__docsbook__read_doc_sections |
Read content for style analysis |
Related Skills#
docs-content-types— tone expectations differ per content typedocs-audience— vocabulary level is a style decisiondocs-accessibility— plain language is also an accessibility concerndocs-analyze— orchestrator